Friday, July 2, 2010

Recently, the JAC met our Hon'ble Minister of communications, Sri A.Raja, at Coimbatore to stress our demands on reimbursement of spectrum charges to BSNL and the delay in implementing assurances given at the time of our strike in April, 2010. Sri Palanisamy, Circle working President of Tamilnadu FNTO and Sri Gopalakrishnan ,All India Organising Secretary, NFTE, duely nominated by FNTO and NFTE , were also in the JAC team that met the Minister.

But BSNLEU in their website, while reporting the meeting with Minister, purposely avaoided mentioning the names of FNTO and NFTE representatives, most probably to create an impression in the minds of workers that they alone are working for it. It is a fair practice to mention all the names of the people whenever a joint representation or joint meeting is made.

Floating all these etiquettes and omitting the names of the representatives of two major unions of the JAC is highly condemnable and regrettable. The convenor, JAC is rather disrupting  than convening unity among the workers. From தேசிய முரசு.

Our questions.

For employees of BSNL, which is the official version of the JAC?

Who is the spokesperson of Joint Action Committee?

Who can give press statements?  Whether all unions or convenor or chairman ?

If Exectuives get 78.2% IDA before non executives what is the role of JAC?

Whether all non executive unions are going to be  in JAC  to fight for gains of executives.

What is the hidden agenda of BSNLEU? To get 78.2% IDA  for executives before non executives or to get 78.2% for executives and non executives.

No comments:

Post a Comment