Ensure Resounding Success
Attempt of NUBSNL(FNTO) to stall the verification failed. No stay on election or on declaration of results and recognition. Go ahead and ensure resounding success for the United Forum's BSNLEU.
Judgemendgt of Supreme Court of India in FCI Case, one Union concept alone is applicable in any Industry in the absence of consensus.
Those who advocate now for one or more, have unhesitatingly accepted the concept of one Union, during the past ten years, both on post / pre poll, by pledging their loyal to one union and enjoyed all privileges. This sudden "Gnanodhaya" to gain second position for not themselves but for someone else is surprising.
The interim order of Honourable High Court of Kerala as published in the website of th Petitioner is placed below:
Text of the interim order passed BY Hon’ble Kerala High Court on 31.01.2011 on WP© No. 35399/2010 filed by NUBSLW (FNTO)
The main contention raised by the petitioner is that the code of discipline, which was framed way back in the year 1958, is not in tune with the policies in other industrial establishments and organizations which recognized more than one Trade Union. The main relief sought in the writ petition is to frame a new code of discipline before holding the referendum proposed to be held to morrow. The entitlement of the petitioner to relief prayed for can be decided only after arguments are addressed on the issues arising for determination in the writ petition. The entitlement of the petitioner to have another recognized union would depend on code of discipline presently in force being held to be arbitrary. In such circumstances I am of the opinion that no grounds have been made out to stay the referendum proposed to be held to morrow. In my opinion the interest of the petitioner can be safeguarded by directing that the result of the referendum being held to morrow will be subject to the out come of the writ petition.
In their website, the Petitioners themselves have observed as under :
The main contention raised by the petitioner is that the code of discipline, which was framed way back in the year 1958, is not in tune with the policies in other industrial establishments and organizations which recognized more than one Trade Union. The main relief sought in the writ petition is to frame a new code of discipline before holding the referendum proposed to be held to morrow. The entitlement of the petitioner to relief prayed for can be decided only after arguments are addressed on the issues arising for determination in the writ petition. The entitlement of the petitioner to have another recognized union would depend on code of discipline presently in force being held to be arbitrary. In such circumstances I am of the opinion that no grounds have been made out to stay the referendum proposed to be held to morrow. In my opinion the interest of the petitioner can be safeguarded by directing that the result of the referendum being held to morrow will be subject to the out come of the writ petition.
In their website, the Petitioners themselves have observed as under :
If final verdict goes in favour will help all applicant unions to get minimum trade union facilities, proportionate representation in council etc.
Now the question is, what will be the future position, "If the verdict goes the other way". In such an eventuality, the management by locking their minds may totally deny facilities to applicant unions is apparently visible.
No comments:
Post a Comment